• About Us
  • List Your Firm
  • Legal Awards
  • Contact Us
Login | My Posts
Lawyers In Malta - Maltese Legal Portal
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Home
  • Law Firms
  • About Malta
    • Maltas Legal System
    • Economy Malta
    • Business in Malta
    • Live and do business in Malta
  • Publications
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Law Firms
  • About Malta
    • Maltas Legal System
    • Economy Malta
    • Business in Malta
    • Live and do business in Malta
  • Publications
No Result
View All Result
Lawyers In Malta - Maltese Legal Portal
No Result
View All Result
Home Articles

CJEU clarifies when payment period can exceed 60 days under Late Payments Directive

Erika Gabarretta (Associate)

by Ganado Advocates
July 24, 2025
in Articles, Legal Cases
Reading Time: 1 min read
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

The Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) delivered a ruling on 6 February 2025 in the case of Przedsiębiorstwo Produkcyjno – Handlowo – Usługowe A. vs. P. S.A., (Case C-677/22) whereby it interpreted the applicability of Article 3(5) of Directive 2011/7/EU on combating late payments in commercial transactions (recast) (the “Late Payments Directive”). Article 3(5) of the Late Payments Directive states that in commercial transactions between undertakings the payment period within such a contract cannot exceed 60 calendar days, unless otherwise expressly agreed in the contract and provided that it is not grossly unfair to the creditor within the meaning of Article 7 of the same directive. The CJEU in the aforementioned ruling examined the two conditions under which the period for payment can exceed 60 calendar days and elaborated on the instances where a derogation from the 60 calendar days for payment can be considered unlawful.

  • To read the rest of the article, please visit this link.
Tags: EU
Previous Post

The requisites for the issuance of a precautionary warrant of prohibitory injunction

Next Post

ID-DRITT XXXV – Clean titles & cross-border conflicts: Resolving the international effects of judicial sales of ships

Next Post

ID-DRITT XXXV – Clean titles & cross-border conflicts: Resolving the international effects of judicial sales of ships

Find a Lawyer

List you Law firm

Want to be a part of our
Law Directory? 

Submit Interest

Popular Tags

AML/CFT regime Anti-money laundering Artificial Intelligence Aviation Banking Blockchain Brexit Business Citizenship by Investment in Malta Commercial Contracts compa Consumer Protection Corporate Law court Court of a appeal Covid 19 cry Debt Collection Digital Transformation Economy Employment Law EU Family Law Financial Services fund GDPR Human Rights iGaming Malta Immigration Insurance Law Intellectual Property International Law Investments Litigation and Arbitration Malta Permanent Residency Program Public Contract Real estate in Malta Shipping and Maritime Malta Tax law Malta Trademarks Trusts Virtual Financial Assets Whistleblowing

A Premium Legal Portal Connecting Lawyers with Clients

Facebook Instagram Linkedin Xing

USEFUL LINKS

Contact Us
Terms & Conditions
Careers at Sedinvest
Advocates in Malta

USEFUL LINKS

Chamber of Advocates
Search for Lawyers in Malta
Why Lawyers in Malta
Malta Lawyers
Lawyers in Malta

AFFILIATE SITES

logo250-white
accountants-logo-tr-1

© 2025 Lawyers in Malta. All Rights Reserved.

Developed by Wizzweb

No Result
View All Result
  • Law Firms
  • About Malta
    • Maltas Legal System
    • Economy Malta
    • Business in Malta
    • Live and do business in Malta
  • Publications
  • About Us
  • List Your Firm

© 2024 Lawyers in Malta - All rights Reserved.